Editorial policy

Curious Match Review aims to make matchmaking and compatibility easier to think about without presenting uncertain claims as facts or telling readers what personal choice to make.

Accuracy and clarity

We check factual statements against suitable information available to us and distinguish explanation from opinion. We avoid treating a matching score, category or shared interest as proof of compatibility. Where an idea is contested or limited, we say so plainly. We do not invent examples as though they describe real people or events.

Independence

Editorial decisions are made for relevance to the publication's subject and readers. A collaboration does not guarantee coverage or a favourable view, and partners do not determine our conclusions. We aim to make the basis of an argument clear so readers can assess it for themselves.

Corrections

If you spot an error or an unclear claim, contact us through the Contact page and identify the article and passage. We review correction requests and amend material when warranted, making the change clear where it affects a reader's understanding.

Partner material and illustrations

Paid, gifted or otherwise partner-supported material is labelled so readers can distinguish it from independent editorial work. Any partner links or placements are identified clearly. Some illustrations may be AI-generated; when that applies, the image is labelled accordingly and is not presented as documentary evidence.